Why Did Switzerland Suspend the MFN Clause?
Switzerland’s decision to suspend the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) clause in its Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with India stems from a pivotal Supreme Court judgment in India. The 2023 ruling declared that the DTAA provisions would not apply unless specifically notified under India’s Income Tax Act.
This verdict overturned an earlier Delhi High Court decision that had ensured Indian and foreign firms avoided double taxation. By effectively nullifying certain tax benefits under the DTAA, the judgment triggered Switzerland’s move to reassess its bilateral tax treaty with India.
The Swiss government announced this suspension on December 11, 2024, marking a turning point in the countries’ tax and trade relations.
How Swiss Firms Like Nestlé Are Impacted
The immediate impact of this suspension is on Swiss corporations with significant investments in India, such as Nestlé, ABB, and Holcim. These companies, which previously enjoyed lower withholding tax rates on dividends under the DTAA, will now face higher tax burdens starting January 2025.
For a consumer giant like Nestlé, heavily reliant on the Indian market, increased taxes on dividend payouts could strain its financial operations and growth strategies.
Additionally, the absence of the MFN clause may force Swiss companies to rethink their long-term investment plans in India, potentially diverting resources to other markets offering more favorable tax regimes.
Challenges for Indian Companies in Switzerland
The suspension of the MFN clause is a two-way street, affecting Indian companies operating in Switzerland as well. IT firms, pharmaceutical giants, and manufacturing companies exporting to or through Switzerland will now face higher taxes on royalties, interest, and dividends.
These additional tax liabilities could lead to reduced profitability for Indian businesses and make Switzerland a less attractive hub for operations in Europe. As January 2025 approaches, Indian companies must brace for an altered tax landscape, increasing their compliance and operational costs.
Threat to the EFTA’s $100 Billion Investment Commitment
Switzerland’s suspension of the MFN clause comes at a time when India and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)—comprising Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein—have agreed on an ambitious $100 billion investment plan over 15 years.
The uncertainty surrounding the DTAA could dampen Swiss enthusiasm for this investment plan, as companies reconsider the risks of doing business in India. This is particularly concerning for sectors like finance, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals, where Switzerland has been a key investor.
Experts argue that renegotiating the tax treaty will be crucial to restoring investor confidence and protecting the $100 billion commitment from faltering.
What Lies Ahead for India-Switzerland Economic Ties?
This development highlights the growing complexity of global tax policies and their impact on international economic partnerships. Switzerland’s suspension of the MFN clause signals its intention to revisit the terms of its agreement with India, potentially seeking to renegotiate more equitable terms.
For India, the decision underscores the need to balance its focus on tax compliance with maintaining its appeal as a global investment hub. The coming months are expected to see intense diplomatic and policy discussions as both nations attempt to resolve the issue and mitigate its economic fallout.
Switzerland’s suspension of the MFN clause in the DTAA with India is a significant shift that could disrupt the bilateral business environment. Swiss firms like Nestlé now face higher taxes, while Indian companies operating in Switzerland must adjust to increased costs.
The decision also places the $100 billion investment plan under the European Free Trade Association at risk, requiring urgent policy interventions to ensure continued economic cooperation.
As the January 2025 implementation deadline nears, stakeholders on both sides are watching closely for steps to restore stability and protect shared economic interests.
Leave a Reply